#DBlogWeek Day 3 Language and Diabetes

May 18, 2016

 

From BittersweetDiabetes:  

 

           There is an old saying that states “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me”. I'm                  willing to bet we've all disagreed with this at some point, and especially when it comes to diabetes. Many                      advocate for the importance of using non-stigmatizing, inclusive and non-judgmental language when                            speaking about or to people with diabetes. For some, they don't care, others care passionately. Where do you              stand when it comes to “person with diabetes” versus “diabetic”, or “checking” blood sugar versus “testing”, or              any of the tons of other examples?"

 

 

Just like so many aspects of diabetes--there is no one definitive answer!   

 

 There are those who prefer to use "person with diabetes' aka PWD:

 

 " WE DON'T CALL PEOPLE WITH OTHER AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES A 'LUPITIC' OR A 'RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIC' OR A 'MYOSITIC' OR A 'PSORIATIC'. WHY THEN 'DIABETIC'? "

 

 

"Will has diabetes, he is not a diabetic."

 

"It matters to me! My son has diabetes, he is not "a diabetic."

 

"It does matter. Diabetes does not make the person. The person is who they are. Why can't it be "a person fighting diabetes" like "a person fighting cancer." I wish people would just stop looking at diabetes and see a real person."

 

 

 

And those who aren't bothered by "diabetic":

 

 

"It doesn't matter to me for most things (T1D for 20 years), but I prefer everyone specify which type of diabetes they are talking about when they speak ..."

 

"I use both interchangeably---in writing I often use "person with diabetes" but when speaking that seems cumbersome. Sometimes diabetic is just faster."

 

 

 

But when it comes to "testing" vs "checking" blood sugar--there is a clear winner.  Checking has a more positive tone.  Testing implies that failure is a possibility.

 

 

 

Which brings to mind--are there "good" bg numbers and "bad" numbers?  If we use those terms, what are we telling ourselves (or our children if we are caregivers of those with diabetes)?  Any blood sugar check is a good thing--because it gives us information that can be acted upon.  High? Give a correction.  Low? Treat.  Anything in between? Move along, nothing to be done here.

 

 

 

And probably the worst terms to use with a PWD-- control and compliant:  

 

"I rather people talk of living with Type 1 Diabetes as management and not control (for example, "How is your management going?" vs. "Are your blood sugars under control?"), because there is so much that can effect our blood sugar that is outside our control and the word control has an underlying implication that if things aren't perfect then you are careless and that is untrue."

 

Exactly.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please reload

Recent Posts

October 2, 2016

September 8, 2016

Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Instagram Social Icon
  • Google+ Basic Square
WHAT'S UP?

TAP:  Teen Advisory Panel

 

Post questions on our Facebook page and we will submit them to our Type 1 Teen Advisory Panel.  Answers will be posted on the PBN Type 1 Teens Blog  @ https://pbntype1teens.wordpress.com/

 

 

EVENT
11/14

Hands of Hope

 

Write Hope on your hands and share it on Instragram and Facebook on November 14.

 

 

blueinaction
Share What You are doing to raise awareness
  • w-facebook
  • Pinterest Clean
  • Twitter Clean
  • Instagram Clean

Disclaimer

 

 

CONTENT DISCLAIMER

Project Blue November is not responsible for, and expressly disclaims all liability for, damages of any kind arising out of use, reference to, or reliance on any information contained within our web site. Any guest blogs posted on the Project Blue November web site are in that person’s words alone and Project Blue November does not accept responsibility for plagiarizing or facts not proven true.

ACCESS TO OTHER SITES

Although Project Blue November may include links providing direct access to other Internet resources, including Web sites, Project Blue November is not responsible for the accuracy or content of information contained in these sites. The links are for resource information only.

ENDORSEMENTS

Links from Project Blue November to third-party sites do not constitute an endorsement by Project Blue November of the parties or their products and services.

MEDICAL ADVICE

All content from Project Blue November should not be taken as direct medical advice.  Always speak to your doctor/endocrinologist for medical advice.

© 2019 By Project Blue November. Proudly Made by Bridgewater Marketing